GLOBAL BUSINESS NETWORK Global B2B Sourcing Network
EN
Partner login
Home / AI export diagnosis

Free AI export diagnosis

Start a check-up with nothing but a website URL. The server really crawls your site and its key pages, then a deterministic rule engine returns 3–8 key findings — each carrying evidence, source and timestamp. Verifiable, not model-generated.

Dimensions

Nine dimensions, checked deterministically

This is not a model writing an opinion about your site. Every dimension has reviewable checks, and each conclusion resolves to four things: rule id, evidence, source and timestamp.

01

GEO

Whether generative engines can reach you, read you, and are willing to cite you. Structured data, citable summaries and crawl access are the core here.

02

SEO

Index coverage on classic search: whether robots and sitemap agree, whether canonical leaves duplicates, and whether internal links carry weight to landing pages.

03

Website

The site itself: reachability, load behaviour, mobile layout, and whether the language entries are complete.

04

Search

How search demand lines up with your pages — what buyers query versus what your pages actually say.

05

Media

Whether what your site claims also appears, consistently and discoverably, on external platforms.

06

Content

Coverage of real buyer questions: for every question a buyer actually asks, is there a page that answers it head on.

07

Market

Fit between target markets and buyers — whether the market choice is right and the buyer profile is clear.

08

Acquisition

How your current channels map to your target customers, and which link is missing from the mix.

09

Conversion

The path from visitor to enquiry: where the entry points are, where the form stalls, and whether follow-up leaves a trace.

Every finding carries evidence: rule id, evidence, source URL and timestamp. Only with all four is a conclusion valid — which is what keeps advice from becoming plausible-sounding but unverifiable.

Output contract

Every conclusion carries twelve fields

A diagnosis is not a paragraph of commentary but a structured, checkable conclusion. A conclusion missing fields never reaches the report — evidence and confidence above all.

Decision

Decision

What this finding says: one problem, one opportunity or one recommendation, in a sentence.

Evidence[]

Evidence

The checkable fact behind it: the page, field, response header or excerpt that was captured. No evidence, no finding.

Confidence

Confidence

How reliable the finding is and where it is weak. Low confidence is stated outright, not hidden.

ExpectedImpact

Expected impact

What fixing it is expected to change, and on what basis. We make no effect claims without a basis.

RiskLevel

Risk level

How risky the action is: what breaks if it is done wrong, and whether it can be undone.

Action

Action

Concrete enough to act on — which file, which setting — rather than directional advice.

ApprovalRequired

Approval required

For high-risk actions the system only proposes and pauses, until a human approves.

ReasonCode

Reason code

Which rule produced the finding, so repeated hits on the same cause can be counted.

SourceVersion

Source version

Which crawl batch this finding is based on, so re-tests compare like with like.

ModelVersion

Model version

The model version involved. If the model changes and findings change, the report shows it.

PromptVersion

Prompt version

Which prompt version was used. Prompts are versioned assets, not text edited on the fly.

RunID

Run ID

Every run is traceable: all findings from one run share a single identifier.

Market recommendations must come from actual diagnosis evidence. The shape of the conclusion is "this company is currently best placed to enter: Country A, Country B, Country C". Country placeholders are used here rather than three country names, because which three must be derived from evidence; without enough evidence we leave it blank and never pass sample data off as a real result.

High-risk actions are never taken by AI on its own. For legal signing, payments, changes to core commission rules, deletion of core data, changes to customer ownership, irreversible external commitments, permission changes and bulk sending, the system only proposes and pauses for human approval.

Two tiers

Check first, then decide on the full diagnosis

The check-up exists so you can see the problems before committing budget. It is not a trial version of the full diagnosis.

No login

Free check-up

  • Starts from a single website URL
  • The server really crawls the site and its key pages
  • Returns 3–8 key findings with evidence, source and timestamp
  • Gives an overview reading across the nine dimensions
Login required

Full diagnosis

  • All findings across the nine dimensions, each with evidence and source
  • P0 / P1 / P2 priority ordering, so it is clear what to fix first
  • AI search visibility matrix: buyer questions × languages × repeated sampling, with competitor comparison and raw answer excerpts
  • An actionable schedule, same-baseline re-tests and a report version number

The check-up tells you what is wrong; the full diagnosis tells you what to fix first, and how you will know whether it improved.

Input

One required field — the rest sharpen the report

The website URL is the only required field. Everything else turns generic conclusions into conclusions about you.

FieldRequirementWhat it is used for
Website URLRequiredThe crawl entry point — the only required field
Company nameOptionalReport attribution and entity check
IndustryOptionalSets the industry baseline so the comparison is fair
Target marketsOptionalMultiple countries or regions, comma separated
Target customer typeOptionalSourcing buyer, distributor, end brand, and so on
Current acquisition channelsOptionalComma separated, for example LinkedIn, trade shows, B2B platforms
Product highlights / main productsOptionalJudges whether content assets match buyer questions
Competitor URLsOptional, up to 5Used for comparison, to see which item the gap sits in

The diagnosis type is chosen here too: free check-up (3–8 key findings) or full diagnosis (login required, nine dimensions).

Flow

Four steps to a working growth loop

The diagnosis is not the destination. It hands off to execution and tracking, otherwise the report sits in a folder.

Free check-up→ Full diagnosis→ Delivery project→ CRM follow-through
01

Free check-up

Enter the website URL; the server crawls it and returns 3–8 key findings.

02

Full diagnosis

After login, unlock all findings across the nine dimensions, priorities and a schedule.

03

Delivery project

Once a service is confirmed, a delivery project and default task list are generated, with owners.

04

CRM follow-through

Opportunity boards and activity timelines keep it moving; re-tests compare on the same baseline as the original conclusions.

Boundaries

State what can be measured; never invent the rest

The credibility of a diagnosis comes from admitting what it does not know.

Crawl discipline

Crawling respects robots.txt. On encountering a captcha, a login wall or rate limiting it stops immediately — no bypass, no retry. Where data is missing, the report says "not obtained" or "cannot be verified" rather than filling the gap with inference.

What is not promised

No fixed ranking or recommendation placement on any search engine or AI platform is promised. Rankings, indexing time and traffic depend on third-party platform rules and competition, not on a single provider's decision.

One thing to be clear about first: the diagnosis reads publicly crawlable information, structured data and the fields you enter. Where a dimension has no external data source, the report states "not obtained" instead of producing a plausible-looking number.

Run a free check-up first

All it needs is a website URL. Results carry evidence, source and timestamp, and can be verified finding by finding.